🔗 Share this article

A digital rights group has claimed to have harvested millions of songs from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to release them publicly.

Possible Impetus for AI Training

Observers said the seeming leak could aid artificial intelligence firms looking for material to develop their technology.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and record names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million tracks, stated that the breach did not constitute its full catalog.

“We have identified and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” said a company representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorized access found a external actor collected public metadata and used questionable methods to circumvent DRM protections.

Archive's Stated Mission and Worries

Spotify does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for providing links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They claimed the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of exchanging large digital files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

Model Development and Copyright Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ rights, remarked the breached music would likely be utilized for training AI models.

“Educating models on pirated material is sadly common in the tech sector, so this accessed music is almost certain to end up training AI models,” he said.

The group's website alludes to a large online archive, a vast online archive of pirated books that has reportedly been used by Meta to train its systems.

The co-founder of an AI startup posted on the professional network that individuals of the public could in theory “create their own private free equivalent of Spotify”. The executive said it could also enable tech companies to “educate models on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Copyright has emerged as a battleground between creatives, authors and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, creative professionals have raised concerns against a ministerial suggestion to let AI companies use protected work without consent unless the rights holder signals. Almost every respondent to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for technology, research and technology told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.