🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.